Track 1
Track 2
Track 3
Track 4
Track 5
Top
In this track we want to open a friendly but critical perspective on the value of arts for innovation. Friendly because we too assume that art holds potential for renewal. Critical because we believe that the moment we reduce art to a will-less pro-innovation management tool, that potential is jeopardised. In a way then, our ambition is to explore how we can engage the arts without instrumentalising them. Put differently: if not in a slavish, straightforward fashion, how can art contribute to innovation?
Track Chairs
Jacco Van Uden, The Hague University Of Applied Sciences
Preben Friis, University Of Southern Denmark
Clive Holtham and Angela Dove
9-15
Jolanta Jagiello
16-23
Teresa Macchia, Adriano Siesser, Cristhian Parra, Zodidi Jewel Gaseb, Paula Mate, David Hakken, Vincenzo D’andrea, and Antonella De Angeli
24-32
Enrique Encinas and Robb Mitchell
33-39
Carolyn Rickett and Anthony Williams
40-46
Merja Ryöppy, Patricia Lima, and Jacob Buur
47-50
Niya Stoimenova, Lenny Van Onselen, and Rianne Valkenberg
51-59
Tony Weir
60-65
In a rapidly transforming and increasingly interconnected world, where demographical, economical, ecological and technological developments tend to transcend existing boundaries we are progressively challenged to rethink and even redesign societies, organizations, relations and practices. We have a responsibility to learn to cope with the challenges of our times. Yet - how might we engage in such challenges in responsible and meaningful ways bearing in mind their complex and interdisciplinary nature?
Track Chairs
Rianne Valkenburg, The Hague University Of Applied Sciences
Mette Gislev Kjærsgaard, University Of Southern Denmark
Bart Barnard, Michel Van Dartel, Nathalie Beekman, Klaas Pieter Lindeman, and Anne Nigten
68-75
Lisa Malmberg and Stefan Holmlid
76-82
Aditya Pawar
83-90
Jantine Bouma
91-98
Catherine E. Brouwer, Martijn Ten Bhömer, Oscar Tomico, and Stephan Wensveen
99-106
Roxanne Leitao and Heath Reed
107-115
Rens Brankaert and Elke den Ouden
116-123
Jeandonné Schijlen, Valerie Van Der Linden, Dorien Meulenijzer, Peterwillem
Vermeersch, Ann Heylighen, And Ku Leuven
124-131
Stella Boess
132-137
Peter Kun and Ingrid Mulder
138-143
Kavitha Varathan and Anne Theiss
144-151
Gloria Lee
152-159
There is an increasing interest in understanding the potential of design as a response to complex problems that cannot be solved solely by technocratic or bureaucratic methods. Designers understand their field as a discipline that connects human meaning and values to products, processes, and systems. Design practices such as conceptual reframing, aesthetic sensitivity, and narratives, reframing and other forms of design thinking are used to meet the need for a more human centred approach—not just to product or service design, but also to the design of organisations, systems, and infrastructures. And, thus, also to management.
Track Chairs
Dick Rijken, The Hague University Of Applied Sciences
Henry Larsen, University Of Southern Denmark
Jos Van Leeuwen, The Hague University Of Applied Sciences
Cynthia Bravo and Isabel Adler
162-167
Lotte Christiansen
168-175
Marisela Gutierrez Lopez, Mieke Haesen, Kris Luyten, And Karin Coninx
176-183
Chris Heape
184-191
Lorna Heaton, Mithra Zahedi, Manon Guité, And Giovanni De Paoli
192-196
Guannan Li
197-200
Patricia Lima, Henrik Sproedt, And Jacob Buur
201-208
Nicola Morelli
209-216
Karen Norman, Henry Larsen, Mark Renshaw, Paula Tucker, And Chris Mowles
217-227
Robin van Oorschot and Frederik Gottlieb
228-233
Jaehyun Park and Arkalgud Ramaprasad
234-240
Frido Smulders
241-248
Pia Storvang and Mette Stromgaard Dalby
249-257
Koen Van Turnhout, Jasper Jeurens, and René Bakker
258-261
Fenne Verhoeven, Aeltsje Brinksma, Matthijs Roumen, And Remko Van Der Lugt
262-269
Democracy and governance are essential for the prosperity and quality of life in social groups – may it be organisations or states. Both phenomena are genuinely social achievements that often were won at a high price. It is important to understand that neither formal nor informal institutions are static but develop evolutionary with their social creators when facing and overcoming challenges. Formal institutions like democracies may suffer from legitimacy problems (such as the EU) or ineffective implementations (such as in organisations stimulating participation and learning) while informal institutions often lack adequate support (such as citizens organising governance between them). In each of these cases participation is required to improve the situation. Special attention is often paid to digital solutions (e.g. e-government and e-democracy) and knowledge generation, management and sharing, which have been on the agenda for decades. But are those reaching far enough, or do they stop where network coverage does? Can they really effectively increase participation, quality or legitimacy? Which role do human practice and norms play for participation?
Track Chairs
Anne Kallio, Lappeenranta University Of Technology Finland
Henrik Sproedt, University Of Southern Denmark
Karianne Rygh, Bas Raijmakers, and Marie De Vos
272-278
Minna Hekanaho, Mirka Rauniomaa, And Annamari Martinviita
279-287
Florian Sametinger and Miriam Lahusen
288-293
Karoline Bille Sahlertz, Leif Bloch Rasmussen, Janni Nielsen, And Rasmus Ulslev Pedersen
294-299
Jan Bats, Rianne Valkenburg, And Peter-Paul Verbeek
300-307
Amalia de Gótzen
308-313
Suvi-Jonna Martikainen, Mirva Hyypiä, Satu Parjanen, And Lea Hennala
314-320
Alessia Cappellini and Arianna Vignati
321-327
Thomas James Lodato and Carl Disalvo
328-336
Peter Van Waart, Cees De Bont, and Ingrid Mulder
337-343
Miguel Navarro Sanint
344-351
Ellya Zulaikha
352-359
Helle Taanquist and Wafa Said Mosleh
360-367
Oliver Stickel, Dominik Hornung, Sarah Rueller, Volkmar Pipek, and Volker Wulf
368-375
We believe it is a fair claim that material objects, physical environments and social practices
are ecologically interconnected and interdependent. As such, they support the performance of a variety of human activities, from individual tasks to collective action. Many of our social practices today, however, are taking place online, seemingly rendering shared material objects and physical environments unnecessary. It is not without a sense of irony that we, at the same time, witness increasing research interest in the role that objects play in everyday life. We do not believe this is merely nostalgic longing for a simpler, physically bounded life. We suggest rather that we have become more aware of the materiality of our lives when objects like network cables, water-resistant clothing and guaranteed salmonella-free chicken fail and derail futuristic visions of immateriality.
Track Chairs
Elisa Giaccardi, Delft University Of Technology
Dennis Day, University Of Southern Denmark
Jacob Buur and Agnese Caglio
378-385
Danielle Wilde
386-393
Sarah Eagle, Sara Reinholtz, Jane Webb, Mahdis Aliasgari, and Marcel Penz
394-397
Sara Reinholtz, Mahdis Aliasgari, Marcel Penz, and Sarah Eagle
398-401
Agnese Caglio and Mie Femø Nielsen
402-405
Mie Femø Nielsen and Agnese Caglio
406-409
Rachael Luck and Kristian Mortensen
410-415
Koen Schellekens, Elisa Giaccardi, Dennis Day, Hayley Hung, Laura Cabrera-Quiros, and Ekin Gedik
416-423
Naushin Malik and Anna Croon Fors
424-431
Nina Huijboom, Michelle De Lourdes Castañeda, Quintero, Helle Taanquist, and Johannes Wagner
432-439
Brian Due
440-448
Helena Hansson
449-457
Merja Ryöppy and Andreas Heiberg Skouby
458-461
Tim Overkamp and Stefan Holmlid
462-469
Wendy Moncur, Miriam Julius, Elise Van Den Hoven, and David Kirk
470-477
Holly Robbins
478-484
Andreas Lund, Mikael Wiberg, and Johan Boden
485-491
Betti Marenko and Philip van Allen
492-499
Nazli Cila, Elisa Giaccardi, Melissa Caldwell, Fionn Tynan‐O’mahony, Chris Speed, and Neil Rubens
500-506